Why Disraeli Was Not Prime Minister of Spain

Posted on March 31st, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || 1 Comment

Isabella of Castille was an idiot; it is not an usual condition in royalty.  Her husband Ferdinand of Aragon actually was bright and completely free of scruples; Machiavelli considered him a role model.  However, Ferdinand turned out to be a little too clever.   

He had a get-rich-quick scheme. The wily and avaricious king commissioned a Spanish Inquisition in 1483 with the idea of gouging wealthy suspects who showed any reluctance toward pork. Of course, the bulk of the loot would go to the crown. The Inquisition, however, was not content to be Ferdinand’s pickpocket. It was going to save Spain from tolerance, innovation and whatever else reeked of heresy. To his dismay, Ferdinand could not control the Holy Office’s pyromania. He became its most comfortable prisoner, complying with the rabid dictates of the Grand Inquisitor.  While the rest of Europe had the Renaissance, Spain had the Inquisition.

On this day in 1492, a pious Isabella and an intimidated Ferdinand ordered the expulsion of Jews from Spain. 

If Mel Torme and I had ghostwritten the proclamation, it would have been the following:

“Heretics roasting on an open fire.
Embers singeing Marranos.
Dies Irae being sung by the fire
While Luth’rans scream in their death throes.

Everybody knows where the Inquisition hangs its hood
They’re record sales on kindling wood.
So always do what those monks ask of you
Or else you will be barbecued.
If the friars find you lack
The proper faith they will put you on the rack
So on their good side be sure to stay
And go to Mass 12 times a day.

Just keep on offering your yearly tithe.
Its’ fire insurance on your life.
And on Ash Wednesday you can gloat in your pew.
The ash won’t be from you.”
 

 

The Passion of the Eugene

Posted on March 30th, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || No Comment

I may give up Passover for Lent.  As if the last 2000 years did not provide persecution, Jews torture themselves once a year by eating a form of styrofoam called matzo.  For eight days we endure it as a substitute for bread. 

According to Exodus and Cecil B. DeMille, when the Jews were fleeing Egypt they did not have time to prepare the bread in any edible form.  Skipping a few steps–including leavening–in the baking, the result was mottled, tasteless slabs, flaky but indestructible.  No self-respecting mold would want to grow on it. 

However, the very nature of matzo makes me doubt the historical basis of the Exodus.   If the Exodus really had occurred, archaeologists certainly would have found the matzo crumbs by now.

Of course, I must mention Passover’s role in Christianity.    Why do you think that Jesus allowed Himself to be crucified?  Even HE couldn’t stand matzo for 8 days.

Die Polar Disorder

Posted on March 29th, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || 1 Comment

On this day in 1912, Robert Falcon Scott ended a rather disappointing trip to Antarctica. Nature evidently did not show the proper respect to a representative of the British Empire. The penguins did not greet his expedition with a few choruses from Gilbert & Sullivan, and the South Pole proved rudely aloof. Indeed, if the Pole had any sense of deference, it would have come to him.

Expecting to be the first gentleman to reach the South Pole, Captain Scott planned a grand tour, with modern conveniences as well as traditional fashions. His expedition included motorized sleds and horses, so he had a choice in how he would ride to the South Pole. Had he personally selected the dog teams, they probably would have been comprised of pugs.

The expedition promised to be an extravaganza. In addition to the the complete catalog from Herrod’s, Scott’s team included a staff of scientists who would provide suitably British names for any discovered species, landmarks and eclectic oddities. Of course, the undertaking would be costly, and His Majesty’s government would only subsidize some of the expenses. Scott actually had some ability as a fundraiser, and found a number of private contributors. Fortunately, in the Edwardian era sponsors were more discreet, so Scott was not obliged to wear a parka covered with corporate decals. (However, you can imagine what Lipton would have paid to be the first tea brewed at the South Pole.)

The expedition arrived in Antarctica in early 1911 and spent the better part of the year preparing for the trip to the South Pole. For lack of Lyons restaurants along the route, food depots were established at some distances from the base camp to accommodate the polar tourists. The motorized vehicles and horses were thoroughly tested and found to be thoroughly inadequate. Neither could withstand the cold. The dog teams proved more resilient, but Scott had more faith in his own bipedal resolve. He and four members of his expedition would walk to the South Pole, dragging supply sleds with them.

After a two month hike, they arrived at the South Pole on January 17, 1912 only to discover that it already was the Norwegian consulate in Antarctica. Roald Amundsen had arrived there a month earlier, using dog sleds. It may have been summer in Antarctica, but Scott and his team were suffering from frostbite, dehydration and hunger. (Amundsen had relied on dogs for both transportation and–when necessary–an entree.) Depressed and malnourished, Scott’s crew became unlucky and careless. On the trek back, one Briton suffered a fatal injury, and no one could quite remember the exact location of the food depots. They actually were quite close to one of the food caches when, on March 29th, Scott and his team starved and froze to death.

Search teams from the base camp found the bodies, along with Scott’s diary. The diary, after careful editing to remove any hint of incompetence, was published as an epic of British heroism.

Of course, his heroism would have been unalloyed if Scott had the least idea what he was doing.

Craigslist: AD 193

Posted on March 28th, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || No Comment

There were some advantages to being a Roman emperor. For instance, until the fifth century, the pay was excellent. You would rarely be turned down at an orgy. Furthermore, the job would never be outsourced to India, if only because the Romans had but a vague notion about India’s location.

Longevity, however, was another matter. From an actuarial perspective, an emperor would have regarded murder as a natural cause of death. In a period of five centuries, Rome had more than 80 emperors. The total is imprecise because the imperial reigns often were.

The Emperor Pertinax might have expected a longer reign. He certainly was an improvement over his predecessor, the depauched and incompetent Commodus. (You remember him from “Gladiator.”) Indeed, on his own merits, Pertinax had the makings of an excellent ruler. He was conscientious, honest and capable. You could add frugality to his virtues, but that actually was a flaw in�Rome. The people wanted their bread and circuses, and the�Praetorian Guard expected “donations”.

The Praetorians could overlook any vice in an emperor but stinginess. Pertinax had every virtue but generosity, so he did not survive his bodyguards. Today is that dubious anniversary.

The impulsive Praetorians seized the throne but had no one to occupy it. Then the extravagantly rich Didius Julianus,�the Steve Forbes of his day, simply decided to buy the position of emperor. He showed up at the Praetorians’ camp and proceeded to bid for their loyalty. Another patrician competed in the auction for the Empire, but Julianus outbid him. His purchased Praetorians then cowed the Senate into acclaiming him the emperor.

The Praetorians’ loyalty lasted two months. When an ambitious general marched on Rome, the imperial guard switched sides again. Julianus did not live to regret it. He now is remembered as a joke. (The same might be said of Steve Forbes.)

My Kind of Town

Posted on March 27th, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || 1 Comment

You may have seen commercials with actor Jeff Daniels promoting Michigan and its wonderful climate for business.

I think that Chicago should try a similar tactic.  This city can’t live forever on the residuals from Al Capone, and we never got any for the atom bomb.  The question is which Chicago-born celebrity would be the perfect representative.  Jim Belushi might be the most authentic, but I am doubt many businesses would relocate based on his recommendations of the 50 best places to throw up. 

No, Chicago would want a more sophisticated appeal; and I can think of one of our natives who has it…

Of course, you know that I am John Malkevich.  If you don’t, go about your pathetic existence and let me speak to the sentient members of the audience.  I want to tell you about the wonderful opportunities awaiting you in Chicago.  Yes, like me, you would rather live in the south of France; but you can make a fortune here that would buy you a paradise in Provence.

Chicago is your kind of town for business.  Here I am at one of our totally mystifying and completely barbaric futures exchanges.  Yes, it is incomprehendible–and what better place to launder your money. 

Does your business need financing?  Here I am on Chicago’s Gold Coast, where you will find many lonely, rich widows.  With this city’s friendly spirit, you will not have any trouble talking your way into their apartments and lives. 

Do you need a creative means of transportation?  Chicago has alleys.  They are perfect for discreet entrances and impromptu exits. 

And even if worse comes to worse, you will appreciate Chicago’s convenient judicial system.  Cook County pays its jurors $17; I am sure that you could be more generous. 

So, if you are looking for a perfect climate for business, Chicago is your sociopath to success.

 

 

Mulling with the Mullahs

Posted on March 23rd, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || No Comment

IRAN SEIZES 15 BRITISH SAILORS, MARINES  

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - Iranian naval vessels on Friday seized 15 British sailors and marines who had boarded a merchant ship in Iraqi waters of the Persian Gulf as part of efforts to protect the Iraqi coastline and its oil terminals, U.S. and British officials said. 

And that is Iran’s film review of “300.”  If you are not familiar with the Iranian rating system, here is an explanation:

Three or fewer hostages: excellent film, two thumbs up. (For instance, the slightly edited musical “Seven Brides for One Brother”) Four to seven: good film, one thumb up. (”The Virgin Suicide Bombers”)

Eight to twelve: fair, one thumb cut off. (”Edward Scimitarhands”)

Thirteen or more:  Don’t ask. (Anything with Jews)

 

And Today’s Special Guest Victim Is…

Posted on March 23rd, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || No Comment

If embezzlers and MBAs had a Hall of Fame, Nicolas Fouquet would be shamelessly prominent. As the Minister of Finance during the early reign of Louis XIV, Fouquet maintained a bookkeeping system modeled after the Gordian Knot. It could be said that he would collect all the revenues but was willing to share some with the government, or at least the officials he liked.

Fouquet had the finest home in France. It seems unlikely that he afforded it just by brownbagging his lunches. The thought certainly occurred to Louis XIV, who evidently resented being the social inferior of his minister. The King ordered Fouquet arrested for embezzlement. There was a public trial, and the verdict could hardly be in doubt, but the judges proved unusally sympathetic to the accused. (Had they been past recipients of Fouquet’s generosity?) They sentenced him to banishment; you might well suspect that Fouquet planned a comfortable exile. The King, however, overruled that lenient sentence and condemned Fouquet to life imprisonment. The disgraced minister spent the last fifteen years�of his life in a less than luxurious cell. He died this day in 1680.

His second career began in the 1930s. Someone in Hollywood had been reading Alexandre Dumas. The 19th century French novelist apparently had screenplays in mind. “The Three Musketeers” and “The Count of Monte Cristo” had been box office hits, and the studios wanted more. While Dumas himself was no longer available, he had been prolific and his works included a sequel to The Three Musketeers. Based on a legend about a prisoner in the Bastille, the story was known as “The Man in the Iron Mask.”

Dumas had imagined that the title character was Philippe the twin brother of Louis XIV, hidden from birth but now the center of a plot to substitute him on the throne. In the novel, the younger brother was the unknowing pawn of ambitious men. Their attempted coup fails, however, due to the heroism of D’Artagnan and the shrewdness of a government minister named Fouquet. The real king is saved (even if France isn’t) and Philippe is condemned to the Bastille where his royal features are covered by an iron mask.

It seemed like another swashbuckler perfect for Hollywood…except for one problem: the villains. In Dumas’ novel the conspirators were the Jesuits, led by the renegade musketeer Aramis. Hollywood was not prepared to vilify the Catholic Church (although the Church never has been shy about vilifying Hollywood). So, a new villain had to be created.

Poor Fouquet already had a criminal record. Since he was an embezzler, why not make him a traitor, too? So, from helping to foil the plot, Fouquet became the mastermind of it.

But then Hollywood came up with yet another improvement on the plot. Instead of making poor Philippe a malleable cipher, portray him as a noble alternative to his wicked older brother Louis–and have the plot succeed. Good Philippe would secretly replaced Louis, who then would become The Man in the Iron Mask. Of course, Fouquet would still have to be a villain, but he would prove his intrinsic evil by being loyal to the legitimate King.

The logic of the plot was very similar to Fouquet’s Gordian bookkeeping. Dumas would have been dismayed; he actually seemed to like the wily minister. In fact, Dumas even gives Fouquet one of the novel’s few jokes.

Fouquet has heard rumors of the twin prince. He asks a trusted henchman, “Do you recall some mystery surrounding the birth of Louis XIV?”

The aide replies, “Do you mean that Louis XIII was not the father?”

Fouquet corrects him, “I said a mystery.”

Subpoena Envy

Posted on March 21st, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || 4 Comments

Responding to charges of improper political influence on the Attoady General, the White House will allow Karl Rove and Harriet Miers to be sort of interviewed by a congressional committee.  In a spirit of compromise, the White House has dropped its request for a $200,000 speaker’s fee.  However, according to to the administration’s remaining demands, these interviews will not be under oath and no recordings and transcripts will be allowed. 

And both Karl Rove and Harriet Miers had further demands.  Mr. Rove will make himself available for a 15 minute cell phone conversation while he is driving to work.  He insists that all questions be sung in a country-and-western style.

Ms. Miers will personally attend the interview.  She insists, however, on formal wear: men in tuxedos and ladies in evening gowns.  All questions must be succinctly phrased, so that a yes or no will suffice.  Furthermore, she demands that she be questioned only by Bennett Cerf, Arlene Francis, Dorothy Killgallen and Bill Cullen; John Daley is to moderate.  (No, she is not being devious; she really doesn’t know.) 

Your Gameshow Machiavelli

Posted on March 19th, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || No Comment

I am best-known as a Jeopardy has-been.  I might be the game’s equivalent to a punch drunk, starting monologues on the Jacobite Rebellion in crowded elevators, and the like.  However, my Jeopardy “contenda” status occasionally lapses into relevance.  Now is one of those rare moments.

March 16th, a date that will live in trivia, the Jeopardy match ended in a three-way tie.  The show has had a number of games where two players tied, but a triumvirate is unprecedented.  The situation required an unusual convergence of circumstances.  First, the player in the lead has to be a nice, thoughtful individual.  Well, how often do nice,thoughtful individuals get into the lead?  You have to be a megalomaniac just to qualify for Jeopardy, and it takes a sociopath to win. 

Second, the other two contestants would require a tie score prior to Final Jeopardy.  That in itself would be rare.  The typical Jeopardy match is a duel between the leading player and a competitive runner-up.  The third player, alas, is usually thinking of hanging himself with the microphone cord.  

But March 16th was the day of exceptions…and the footnote in game show chivalry belongs to a Mr. Scott Weiss.  (Mel Gibson obviously won’t be rooting for him.)

You might wonder if I would have been so noble in similar circumstances.  I can imagine playing for a tie against:  

Mahatma Gandhi and St. Francis of Assisi

or Al Capone and Vin Diesel

Beating Gandhi and St. Francis, I probably could not live with myself.  Beating Capone and Diesel, I probably could not live.

I imagine that I also would settle for a tie score if competing against Uma Thurman and Anne Hathaway.  In fact, I would probably be giving them the answers.

 

 

 

The Hystery of St. Patrick

Posted on March 17th, 2007 in Uncategorized by Eugene Finerman || No Comment

And hereth is from the first draft of The Book of Kells…

And St. Patrick spoke to the Happy Hour crowd at The Drunken Druid’s Pub. “Consider all that God has to offer you.”

And the crowd grumbled, “Not that shamrock bit again.”

Patrick replied, “Obviously you are in no hurry for eternal salvation. You want immediate benefits. Okay. In my religion, we don’t have to sacrifice your good-looking virgins in the nearest bog…or anywhere. In fact, we want your homeliest ones and we’ll put them in convents.”

And the crowd considered this a miracle. But a bartending Druid challenged Patrick. “Now, what would you be wanting them homely virgins? After all, they are still our sisters.”

And Patrick answered, “We’ll guarantee them full-time work in gratifying jobs–teaching and terrorizing the children of the good-looking former virgins.”

But the Druid demanded, “But what kind of God would want a homely virgin?” And the crowd had to agree.

Patrick shrugged and said, “A Jewish one. They have the strangest taste in shiksas.”

The Druid sneered, “A Jewish God? One who can’t hold his own liquor?”

Patrick answered, “But He can make the liquor, distribute and market it!’

And so Ireland converted.

Euan the Bard

« Previous Entries